Skip Navigation


Bioscience Horizons Advance Access originally published online on February 25, 2009
Bioscience Horizons 2009 2(1):44-54; doi:10.1093/biohorizons/hzp009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
2/1/44    most recent
hzp009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haley, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Haley, M. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ecology
Right arrow Environmental Science
Right arrow Physiology
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2009 The Author(s)
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

The impact of stream support on the hydrology and macrophytes of the upper Bristol Avon

Mark A. Haley*

School of Science and the Environment, Bath Spa University, Bath, UK

* Corresponding author: School of Science and the Environment, Bath Spa University, Bath, UK. Tel: +44 0779 2347073. Email: ancientpathways{at}hotmail.co.uk

Supervisor: Dr D. Watson, Bath Spa University, Bath, UK


  Abstract

Low river flow due to water abstraction has impacted the macrophyte communities on several rivers in England. Stream Support is a method of alleviating low flows by augmenting water supply to the headwater channels of rivers when flow falls below a trigger level. This project has studied that the effect Stream Support has had on the hydrology of the upper Bristol Avon, and the consequent impact these changes have had on the macrophyte communities of the river. The Winterbourne classification methodology was used to investigate hydrological effects on macrophyte communities since the early 1990s. Stream Support was found to have successfully targeted low flow conditions with the annual Q95 measure of low flow closely associated with augmentation (Tetbury: R2 = 71%, p < 0.001; Sherston: R2 = 78%, p < 0.001). Decade long Q95 (discharge exceeded 95% of the time) measures of low flow on the river were shown to have risen in 1998–2007 by 60% above measures for 1978–1987 and 1988–1997. Aquatic species such as Ranunculus penicillatus pseudofluitans had increased coverage since the 1990s by as much as 40%, but wetland species such as Myosotis scorpioides and Mentha aquatica had marginally lower coverage. These changes may be partly attributable to a reduction in low flow conditions. Stream Support may not be sustainable if global warming leads to annually occurring prolonged periods of summer drought.

Key words: Stream Support, hydrology, macrophytes, aquatic plants, low flows, water abstraction, Bristol Avon

Submitted on 30 September 2008; accepted on 18 December 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.