Skip Navigation


Bioscience Horizons Advance Access originally published online on April 24, 2008
Bioscience Horizons 2008 1(2):128-135; doi:10.1093/biohorizons/hzn017
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
1/2/128    most recent
hzn017v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, N.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2008 The Author(s)
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Species richness and aggregation effects on the productivity of ruderal plant communities under drought perturbation

Nodoka Nakamura*

School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading, PO Box 237, RG6 6AR, UK

* Corresponding author. Oxford University Centre for the Environment, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PG, UK. Tel: 01865 283933 Email: nodoka.nakamura{at}ouce.ox.ac.uk

Supervisor: Dr Andrew Wilby, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Reading, UK. Present address: Department of Biological Sciences, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.


   Abstract

The effect of species richness and spatial aggregation on the stability of community productivity in response to drought perturbation was investigated with experimental plant communities. Communities comprising all single- and three-species combinations of the ruderal species, Capsella bursa-pastoris, Tripleurospermum inodorum, Poa annua, and Stellaria media, were established in glasshouse. Habitat patchiness was manipulated by applying different seed-sowing patterns, either aggregated or random. After the establishment of communities, 8 days of drought treatment was imposed. Followed by a week of recovery with a regular watering regime, aboveground biomass was harvested. Community biomass was not affected by species richness or by aggregation, but was affected by perturbation. When multi-species community productivity was compared with monocultures in relative terms, species mixtures performed better in drought-induced conditions. This suggests that the positive effect of species richness may be enhanced under the perturbed condition. Sampling effects were evident under perturbation favouring the least productive species, P. annua and drought-tolerant S. media. All species except C. bursa-pastoris showed reduced productivity in species mixtures, but this may be mitigated under perturbed environments by species complementarity. Lack of clear responses to aggregation may suggest that the revealed diversity effect is not related to spatial structure. While competition predominates in communities in the resource-rich environment, drought perturbation enhance overall community productivity via a shift in relative significance of species interactions from competition to sampling and complementarity effects.

Key words: biodiversity effects, ecosystem stability, drought perturbation, relative yield total


Submitted on 3 October 2007; accepted on 21 December 2007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.